[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Citation
magiran
..
Civilica.com
/https://civilica.com/l/139890
..
:: Volume 2, Issue 1 (4-2024) ::
Knowledge of Nursing 2024, 2(1): 94-109 Back to browse issues page
Positivism and Paradigm Transformation in Nursing: A Narrative–Philosophical Review
Akbar Javadi , Mehrdad Amiri * , Heshmatolah Heydari
Department of Philosophy and Islamic Theology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran , Amiri.m@lu.ac
Abstract:   (46 Views)
Background and aim: Philosophical debates in nursing have examined the nature of valid knowledge and its adequacy for practice, education, and policy. Positivism, as the dominant paradigm, has provided scientific legitimacy through empiricism and measurability, yet its reductionism has limited nursing’s ability to address relational and experiential dimensions of care, prompting critiques and the rise of alternative paradigms.
Materials and methods: A philosophical narrative review was conducted by searching through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, ProQuest, and supplementary sources (1985–2025). Of the 412 records identified, 12 were included in this review. Data were synthesized through interpretive analysis involving immersion, comparative critique, thematic coding, and integration into a conceptual framework.
Results: Positivism has shaped nursing’s scientific identity, but it has also generated epistemological gaps. Post‑positivism, interpretivism, critical theory, realism, and mixed methods have expanded the epistemological landscape, fostering methodological pluralism. Contrasting perspectives, such as critiques of “qualitative positivism,” have also enriched the debate. Synthesizing these insights, the Evolutionary Nursing Paradigm Pathway (ENPP) was developed, depicting four stages of positivist dominance, recognition of gaps, emergence of alternatives, and consolidation of pluralism.
Conclusion: Nursing knowledge is increasingly defined by epistemological pluralism, where research questions—not paradigmatic allegiance—guide methodological choice. The ENPP framework clarifies the role of paradigms in nursing’s ongoing development and strengthens the discipline’s capacity to address care complexities, promote health equity, and deepen understanding of health and illness.
 
Keywords: Positivism, nursing epistemology, paradigm transformation, post positivism, epistemological pluralism, critical realism.
Full-Text [PDF 439 kb]   (67 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2026/02/22 | Accepted: 2024/04/1 | Published: 2024/04/1
References
1. Edwards D, Burnard P, Bennett K, Hebden U. A longitudinal study of stress and self-esteem in student nurses. Nurse Education Today. 2010;30(1):78-84. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2009.06.008]
2. McCrae N. Whither nursing models? The value of nursing theory in the context of evidence‐based practice and multidisciplinary health care. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2012;68(1):222-9. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05821.x]
3. Cancian R. Augusto Comte revisitado: Positivismo, sociologia e intervenção social. Revista Sem Aspas. 2021:e021015. [DOI:10.29373/sas.v10i00.15744]
4. Halfpenny P. Positivism and Sociology (RLE Social Theory): Explaining Social Life: Routledge; 2014. [DOI:10.4324/9781315763477]
5. Awodele OA. Framework for Managing Risk in Privately Financed Market Projects in Nigeria [PhD thesis]. Edinburgh: Heriot-Watt University; 2012.
6. Taylor C, White S. Knowledge and Reasoning in Social Work: Educating for Humane Judgement. British Journal of Social Work. 2006;36(6):937-54. [DOI:10.1093/bjsw/bch365]
7. Gray JR, Grove SK, Sutherland MA. Burns and Grove's the practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence. 9th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2021.
8. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2021.
9. Rolfe G. Expanding nursing knowledge: Understanding and researching your own practice. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1998.
10. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2018.
11. Cody WK. Values-Based Practice and Evidence-Based Care: Pursuing Fundamental Questions in Nursing Philosophy and Theory. Philosophical and Theoretical Perspectives for Advanced Nursing Practice. 2013:5-14.
12. Weaver K, Olson JK. Understanding Paradigms Used for Nursing Research. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2006;53(4):459-69. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03740.x]
13. Crotty MJ. The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. 1998.
14. Polit DF, Beck CT. Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2022.
15. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research. Handbook of Qualitative Research. 1994;2(163-194):105.
16. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2018.
17. Chinn PL, Kramer MK. Knowledge Development in Nursing: Theory and Process: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014.
18. Bhaskar R. A Realist Theory of Science: Routledge; 2013. [DOI:10.4324/9780203090732]
19. Maxwell JA. A Realist Approach for Qualitative Research: Sage; 2012.
20. Risjord M. Nursing Knowledge: Science, Practice, and Philosophy: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
21. Richard L, Gendron S, Cara C. Modélisation de la pratique infirmière comme système complexe: une analyse des conceptions de théoriciennes en sciences infirmières. Aporia. 2012;4(4):30-41. [DOI:10.18192/aporia.v4i4.2909]
22. Sukhera J. Narrative Reviews: Flexible, Rigorous, and Practical. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 2022;14(4):414-7. [DOI:10.4300/JGME-D-22-00480.1]
23. Green BN, Johnson CD, Adams A. Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. Journal of Sports Chiropractic and Rehabilitation. 2001;15(1):5-19.
24. Silva AR, Padilha MI, Petry S, Silva VSE, Woo K, Galica J, et al. Reviews of Literature in Nursing Research: Methodological Considerations and Defining Characteristics. Advances in Nursing Science. 2022;45(3):197-208. [DOI:10.1097/ANS.0000000000000418]
25. Greenhalgh T, Thorne S, Malterud K. Time to Challenge the Spurious Hierarchy of Systematic Over Narrative Reviews? European Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2018;48(6):e12931. [DOI:10.1111/eci.12931]
26. Overcash JA, editor. Narrative Research: A Viable Methodology for Clinical Nursing. Nursing Forum. 2004;39(1):12-19. [DOI:10.1111/j.0029-6473.2004.00015.x]
27. Snyder H. Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research. 2019;104:333-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039]
28. Rutty JE. The Nature of Philosophy of Science, Theory and Knowledge Relating to Nursing and Professionalism. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1998;28(2):243-50. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00795.x]
29. Kim HS. The Nature of Theoretical Thinking in Nursing: Springer Publishing Company; 2010.
30. Fealy GM. The Theory‐Practice Relationship in Nursing: An Exploration of Contemporary Discourse. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1997;25(5):1061-9. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.19970251061.x]
31. Holmes D, Perron A, O'Byrne P. Evidence, Virulence, and the Disappearance of Nursing Knowledge: A Critique of the Evidence‐Based Dogma. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing. 2006;3(3):95-102. [DOI:10.1111/j.1741-6787.2006.00058.x]
32. Holmes D, Murray SJ, Perron A, Rail G. Deconstructing the Evidence‐Based Discourse in Health Sciences: Truth, Power and Fascism. International Journal of Evidence‐Based Healthcare. 2006;4(3):180-6. [DOI:10.1097/01258363-200609000-00003]
33. Burns M, Bally J, Burles M, Holtslander L, Peacock S. Influences of the Culture of Science on Nursing Knowledge Development: Using Conceptual Frameworks as Nursing Philosophy in Critical Care Nursing. Nursing Philosophy. 2020;21(4):e12310. [DOI:10.1111/nup.12310]
34. Thorne S. Interpretive description: Qualitative research for applied practice. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2016. Chapter 4, Theoretical foundations:63-82.
35. Sandelowski M. The Problem of Rigor in Qualitative Research. Advances in Nursing Science. 1986;8(3):27-37. [DOI:10.1097/00012272-198604000-00005]
36. Phillips DC, Burbules NC. Postpositivism and Educational Research: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC; 2000. [DOI:10.5040/9798216410935]
37. Plano Clark VL. Mixed methods research. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2017;12(3):305-306. [DOI:10.1080/17439760.2016.1262619]
38. Morgan DL. Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained: Methodological Implications of Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2007;1(1):48-76. [DOI:10.1177/2345678906292462]
39. Rajab Dizavandi F, Heydari A. Critical Realism: An Emerging Approach in Nursing. Medical Education Bulletin. 2021;2(3):275-86.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Javadi A, Amiri M, Heydari H. Positivism and Paradigm Transformation in Nursing: A Narrative–Philosophical Review. Knowledge of Nursing 2024; 2 (1) :94-109
URL: http://knjournal.ir/article-1-132-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 2, Issue 1 (4-2024) Back to browse issues page
دانش پرستاری knowledge of nursing
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 41 queries by YEKTAWEB 4741